The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

This the last of three posts related to strength/preference assessments.  I previously shared on the Clifton StrengthsFinder and the Theory of Multiple Intelligence.  There are many other assessments available such as the DISC Assessment and SIMA (System to Identify Motivated Abilities).  The triangle is the strongest geometric shape.  Similarly, using three assessments will provide you with a clearer multi-faceted perspective of your strengths.

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator was developed by the mother-daughter partnership of Katharine Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers. It is an adaptation of the theory of psychological types produced by Carl Jung. There is a lot of depth in the theory but, at its simplest, it consists of 16 types.

I completed the required training to administer the MBTI, and I have conducted a number of small group training sessions and individual assessment reviews.

At the heart of the Myers Briggs theory are four preferences. It measures whether you prefer to deal with:

  • People and things (Extraversion or “E”), or ideas and information (Introversion or “I”).
  • Facts and reality (Sensing or “S”), or possibilities and potential (Intuition or “N”).
  • Logic and truth (Thinking or “T”), or values and relationship (Feeling or “F”).
  • A lifestyle that is well-structured (Judgment or “J”), or one that goes with the flow (Perception or “P”).

In Myers Briggs theory, for each pair you prefer one style over the other. You combine the letters associated with your preferences to get your Myers Briggs personality type. For example, having preferences for E, S, T and J gives a personality type of ESTJ. Although you have preferences, you still use all eight styles – in the same way that most people are right-handed but they still use both hands.

  • Extraversion and Introversion – The first pair of styles is concerned with the direction of your energy. If you prefer to direct your energy to deal with people, things, situations, or “the outer world”, then your preference is for Extraversion. If you prefer to direct your energy to deal with ideas, information, explanations or beliefs, or “the inner world”, then your preference is for Introversion.
  • Sensing and Intuition – The second pair concerns the type of information/things that you process. If you prefer to deal with facts, what you know, to have clarity, or to describe what you see, then your preference is for Sensing. If you prefer to deal with ideas, look into the unknown, to generate new possibilities or to anticipate what isn’t obvious, then your preference is for Intuition. The letter N is used for intuition because I has already been allocated to Introversion.
  • Thinking and Feeling – The third pair reflects your style of decision-making. If you prefer to decide on the basis of objective logic, using an analytic and detached approach, then your preference is for Thinking. If you prefer to decide using values – i.e. on the basis of what or who you believe is important – then your preference is for Feeling.
  • Judgment and Perception – The final pair describes the type of lifestyle you adopt. If you prefer your life to be planned, stable and organized then your preference is for Judging (not to be confused with ‘Judgmental’, which is quite different). If you prefer to go with the flow, to maintain flexibility and respond to things as they arise, then your preference is for Perception.

When you decide on your preference in each category, you have your own personality type. There are 16 distinct four-letter personality types based on your four preferences. The goal of knowing about personality type is to understand yourself better and appreciate differences between people. As all types are equal, there is no best type.  My type is ISFJ, with a slight preference for I, S and F, and a strong preference for J.

The best reason to choose the MBTI instrument to discover your personality type is that hundreds of studies over the past 40 years have proven the instrument to be both valid and reliable. In other words, it measures what it says it does (validity) and produces the same results when given more than once (reliability). When you want an accurate profile of your personality type, ask if the instrument you plan to use has been validated.

The theory of psychological type was introduced in the 1920s by Carl G. Jung. The MBTI tool was developed in the 1940s by Isabel Briggs Myers and the original research was done in the 1940s and ’50s. This research is ongoing, providing users with updated and new information about psychological type and its applications. Millions of people worldwide have taken the Indicator each year since its first publication in 1962.

For more information on the various types and their impact on relationships, as well as how to take the 93-question assessment from a qualified professional, visit

Here is a link to an interesting article related to Myers-Briggs type and exercise preferences.

Published by Michael Natt

Embracing Health and Happiness in all dimensions: 1. Spirit 2. Soul 3. Body 4. Relationships 5. Purpose

One thought on “The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

  1. I think that Myers-Briggs is a very useful tool and that it gives insight—IF—you stick to Myers-Briggs and NOT the *Functions”on-the-brain” FAD that it sadly has morfed into online. Two VERY good books are:

    Life Types by Hirsch and Kummerow, and also:

    Type Talk by Kroeger and Theussen. should have both. Very informative! Highly recommended.

    But— nowadays….who even talks about “the 4 letters” anymore? Nope, now “everybody and their dog” has jumped onto the “All Functions All the Time” bandwagon and everything is endless droning on about introverted sensing, extroverted feeling, auxilary functions, introverted intuition…Bleeaugh! If yiu buy isabel myers briggs book “Gifts Differing” , yes, functions are mentioned, but bruefly, and nowhere near with the near-fanaticism we see online today. I blame alot if this on some guy who goes by the name of “Dave Superpowers”. This guy made LOTS of videos several years back when there was alot less online. He came on youtube, had alot less “competition” than now, talked kinda fast, sounded confident, put up many videos and i think far too many folks just caved-in, went along without having much other knowledge, and just endedu up repeating alot of his views on functions!

    Was this guy ever certified at all?
    Did he wrute any book? I doubt it. I’ve lost track of him.
    But i think he simply overwhelmed alot iffolks by making more vudeos thanmany others, some years ago. By now, i think he may have simply went on his own and started his own Type-business. I say instead, “Back to the Books”. The real Myers-Briggs books, that i mentioned. Less opinion. More research. Spread this message.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: